Home · World · Nov 9 archive
Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Lindsay Clancy's Murder Case
Confirmed
In Short: A Massachusetts judge has denied Lindsay Clancy's motion to dismiss her murder case, potentially clearing the way for a retrial.
Judge William Sullivan ruled on Monday that a retrial would not violate Clancy's constitutional rights against double jeopardy.
The case involves the deaths of Clancy's three young children in January 2023.
Clancy's defense team argued that Sullivan should have dismissed the case after a 26-day jury trial ended in a mistrial on September 4, 2026, due to a deadlock.
The deadlock was caused by a lone juror who voted to convict Clancy of first-degree murder, while the other 11 jurors intended to acquit her by reason of insanity.
Sullivan said the defense failed to demonstrate that juror questioning was necessary for Clancy's defense and that it would have been coercive.
Clancy's lawyers argued that Sullivan should have removed the holdout juror and allowed deliberations to continue.
Prosecutors have acknowledged Clancy's mental health issues but maintain that she acted deliberately and understood her actions were wrong.
Clancy's defense team has argued that she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis at the time of the killings.
The judge's ruling clears the path for prosecutors to pursue the case again.
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington told the court that the defense had obtained information suggesting the holdout juror used a cellphone during the case.
What this adds
The judge's decision follows a previous ruling where he declared a mistrial due to the jury's deadlock.
The case has garnered significant attention, with social media users spreading conspiracy theories about Patrick Clancy, Lindsay's ex-husband, being involved in the deaths of their children.
Background
Lindsay Clancy's lawyers urged Judge William Sullivan to dismiss her first-degree murder charges, arguing that retrying her would violate her constitutional rights.
What's confirmed
- "Because the court concludes that there was manifest necessity for a mistrial based on the jury's deadlock, a retrial on the murder indictments does not violate Clancy's right not to be placed in double jeopardy."
- Because the jurors failed to unanimously agree on whether the prosecution had proved Clancy was guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" as required by US law, the judge declared a mistrial on 4 September, which means that she was neither found guilty nor not guilty.
- The BBC's Ione Wells on how the Lindsay Clancy trial gripped America - and ultimately fell apart A Massachusetts judge has denied a motion to dismiss the murder case against Lindsay Clancy, the US woman accused of killing her three children.
- Clancy’s 26-day trial ended in a mistrial on Sept. 4, 2026, after jurors said they could not reach a unanimous verdict.
- A judge has denied a motion to dismiss the murder case against Lindsay Clancy, potentially clearing the way for her to be retried next year in the deaths of her three young children.
- Clancy’s lawyers moved to dismiss the charges on double jeopardy grounds, arguing that the judge should have removed the one juror who favored conviction, then allowed jury deliberations to continue.
- Clancy has never denied that she killed her three young children in 2023, but her lawyer has argued that Clancy had postpartum psychosis and was unable to control her behavior.
- Judge William Sullivan gestures to the attorneys during Lindsay Clancy's hearing in Plymouth Superior Court, Monday, Nov.
- Prosecutors have acknowledged that Clancy had mental health problems, but they said she acted deliberately and understood her actions were wrong.
- Defense attorney Kevin Reddington listens to the prosecutor during Lindsay Clancy's hearing in Plymouth Superior Court, Monday, Nov.
What's still developing
- Judge William Sullivan of Plymouth Superior Court, who presided over the first trial, found the jury’s inability to reach a unanimous verdict created a “manifest necessity” for the September mistrial.
- Judge William Sullivan said he would take a motion for a required finding of not guilty under advisement and did not issue a ruling Tuesday.
- EN ESPAÑOL | Declaran juicio nulo en el caso de Lindsay Clancy tras jurado no alcanzar veredicto The deliberations took a dramatic turn late in the week when the judge said he was going to declare a mistrial Friday before suddenly changing course and giving her defense attorney a chance to appeal to the top court in Massachusetts.
- An attorney for Patrick Clancy, whose ex-wife, Lindsay Clancy, is accused of killing the couple's three young children, issued a statement Tuesday calling for an end to conspiracy theories about the case that have spread largely on social media.
- You can find more of our reporting on the mistrial of Massachusetts mother who killed her three children here: Full report: Judge declares mistrial in Lindsay Clancy case Explained: Lindsay Clancy mistrial – what happens next?
- Patrick Clancy’s legal team is pushing back against social media users who have accused him of being involved in the deaths of his three children.
- A judge on Massachusetts’ top court on Friday denied a last minute attempt by Lindsay Clancy’s lawyers to prevent the judge who had presided over her triple-murder trial from declaring a mistrial.
- He issued his rulings on Monday: Clancy, 36, was on trial over the summer for the deaths of 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan at their Duxbury home on Jan. 24, 2023.