Home · Politics · Nov 2 archive

Judge Rejects New Charges Against FBI Officials in Hunter Biden Laptop Case

· Confirmed

Politics Desk

In Short: A federal judge dismissed a criminal complaint against two former FBI officials accused of misleading Congress about their knowledge of the Hunter Biden laptop investigation.

Joe Biden
Photo: Adam Schultz / Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui rejected an amended criminal complaint filed by the Justice Department against Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides, according to Abcnews and the Los Angeles Times. The complaint, which added a new obstruction charge, was deemed improperly submitted by Faruqui.

Abcnews reported that the judge criticized the Justice Department for filing an unsigned criminal complaint, describing it as inappropriate given the defendants' presumption of innocence. Faruqui noted that this case had several atypical aspects, including the decision to file charges via criminal complaint, which is more often used when the government needs to take a defendant into custody immediately.

The Los Angeles Times and Midmichigannow reported that the case accuses Floris and Benavides of falsely downplaying their knowledge about a laptop Hunter Biden abandoned at a computer repair shop in 2019. The Justice Department contends that the defendants' lack of knowledge allowed them to avoid further questioning about Hunter Biden and impeded the congressional investigation.

According to Abcnews, the judge said he had never seen a prosecutor file an unsigned criminal complaint, describing it as inappropriate. Faruqui also noted that the case pertained to Hunter Biden’s laptop and investigations around it.

Faruqui said prosecutors created “their own category of charging” with the new complaint they tried to bring against Floris and Benavides. He said the case was about “Hunter Biden’s laptop, investigations around that.”

Faruqui dismissed the case after defense attorneys and the judge noted the unusual move to charge the case through a criminal complaint, which is more often used by prosecutors when they have an urgent need to take people into custody.

Faruqui said the case was political, with Faruqui noting that the basis for the investigation was Trump administration suspicions that the FBI in 2020 had suppressed intelligence that could have been harmful to the Bidens.

According to Abcnews, the judge said he had concerns that the case would be political, and he ticked off several atypical aspects of the case, including the decision to file charges via criminal complaint.

Faruqui said the case pertained to Hunter Biden’s laptop and investigations around it, and that the Justice Department had failed to show probable cause that Floris and Benavides had lied to lawmakers.

Faruqui said the case was about some political football and not the law or the facts. He said he would be ordering that the new version of the charging documents be “struck from the record,” though the Justice Department could try to add new charges the proper way.

The defense attorneys for Floris and Benavides have called the case baseless and politically motivated, according to Abcnews and Wsls. They said Floris served her nation as a dedicated FBI intelligence officer for nearly 20 years, and accused the Justice Department of building its case on hearsay.

The judge said it was not the court’s practice to file unsigned complaints on the docket. Faruqui said he had concerns that the case would be political.

What this adds

The sources have not established the exact timeline of the investigation or the specific details of the laptop's discovery and handling by the FBI.

What's confirmed

What's still developing

Sources