Home · Science · Nov 1 archive

Scientists Challenge Long-Held Theory on Origin of Life

Confirmed

Science Desk

In Short: A group of scientists is challenging the long-held theory that comets played a crucial role in the origin of life on Earth.

STS 61 A crew leave operations & checkout facility for launch pad, NASA
NASA (61a-s-015) — public domain

A group of scientists is challenging the long-held theory that comets played a crucial role in the origin of life on Earth. According to new computer simulations, the fragile organic molecules supposedly carried by comets would have been destroyed upon impact, upending an established origin of life theory that dates back to at least 1961.

The popular theory that comets were crucial in kick-starting life on Earth billions of years ago may not hold up, according to new research. Comets, often referred to as 'dirty snowballs,' were thought to have deposited water and organic molecules on Earth’s surface, but recent simulations suggest that the high temperatures and pressures during impact would have destroyed these molecules.

Professor Ernest Chi Fru at Cardiff University and his colleagues have also proposed a new theory suggesting that complex life on Earth may have begun 1.5 billion years earlier than previously thought. They analyzed sediment cores drilled from the rock in Gabon and found evidence that a 'laboratory' for life was created just before the formation of fossils that could 'wiggle' and move of their own accord.

The chemistry of the rock showed evidence that a nutrient-rich shallow marine inland sea was created by the collision of two continental plates under water, which could have supported early life. However, the ideas are a big departure from conventional thinking and not all scientists agree with these findings.

The new research challenges the conventional understanding of how life began on Earth and could lead to a reevaluation of the conditions necessary for life to emerge. While the findings are significant, they do not definitively rule out the possibility of successful comet impacts, but they do suggest that comets may not have been as useful for prebiotic chemistry as previously thought.

What's confirmed

What's still developing

Sources