Home · Politics · Oct 8 archive

A Supreme Court order could upend the price of political ads on TV. Here’s how

Confirmed

Politics Desk

In Short: The Supreme Court has blocked President Trump's plan to restrict voting by mail, ruling it is too late to impose new postal service rules for the November election.

Donald Trump swearing in ceremony
Photo: The White House / Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

The Supreme Court has blocked President Trump's plan to restrict voting by mail, ruling it is too late to impose new postal service rules for the November election. The justices left in place a judge’s order that prevents the U.S. Postal Service from implementing such a system on such a fast timeline.

The Trump administration had argued that the federal government would be seriously harmed by voter fraud if it did not impose the new rules. However, a federal judge had already halted the plan nationwide, finding that the Trump administration had presented no evidence of widespread fraud.

YouTube — Breaking News Briefing YouTube

Instead, the states had presented ample evidence that implementing such a system ahead of the midterms would pose tremendous risk. 'Compliance with the USPS’ rule would be impossible ahead of the midterms, meaning that millions of voters would be unable to vote by mail and some would not be able to vote at all,' the state attorneys general told the court last week.

The decision came after the court twice last week ruled against Republicans by declining to revive a new congressional map in Missouri that would have eliminated one of two Democratic-held districts. In both instances, the court said it would not countenance such actions.

Election law experts told NBC News that the court is going to pay very close attention to any extraordinary actions that destabilize the electoral process. 'I think the court is going to pay very close attention to any extraordinary actions that destabilize the electoral process,' said Bob Bauer, who served as White House counsel under President Barack Obama.

The court's decision on the voting by mail issue suggests that the justices will not be receptive to last-minute efforts to change election rules heading into the midterms. 'There’s a signal here that this sort of late intervention is going to receive scrutiny,' Travis Crum, an NBC News contributor and law professor at Washington University in St. Louis, said.

The Supreme Court has shown in other cases that the conservative majority follows its own agenda, not Trump’s, and has delivered him major defeats this year on his sweeping tariffs and plan to roll back birthright citizenship. 'But as the Supreme Court has shown in other cases, the conservative majority follows its own agenda, not Trump’s, and has delivered him major defeats this year on his sweeping tariffs and plan to roll back birthright citizenship,' NBC News reported.

The case could return to the Supreme Court as the litigation continues. 'I think there's a fair chance that it winds back up in front of the Supreme Court eventually,' said Josh Gerstein, a contributor to Fox News Digital.

The Missouri Supreme Court faulted Republican Secretary of State Denny Hoskins for delaying a decision on whether the new map could be challenged, ultimately finding him in contempt for defying its ruling in favor of plaintiffs. 'I look forward to my day in court,' Hoskins said in a post on X that cited the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Kweon Seong-dong, a prominent MP in South Korea, was sentenced to two years in prison by a lower court for accepting 100 million won (S$87,000) in illegal political funds in exchange for helping the Unification Church. The Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s guilty verdict, finding that the key evidence in the case was admissible as evidence, and that the defendant had received illegal political funds.

Susan Collins (R‑Maine), one of her joint fundraising committees and a super PAC backing her campaign each bought airtime on a Portland TV station during “Wheel of Fortune.” For each 30-second spot, both Collins’ campaign and her JFC paid $2,200.

What's confirmed

What's still developing

Sources