Home · Health · Oct 6 archive

Higher Self-Esteem Linked to Better Weight Loss in Group Therapy

Developing

Health Desk

In Short: Researchers found that participants with higher self-esteem scores experienced better weight loss outcomes in group therapy settings compared to individual therapy.

Self Esteem (2021)
Photo: Raph_PH / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

The study, a secondary analysis of an earlier clinical trial, involved 1220 participants at 36 rural primary care clinics in the Midwest.

In-clinic group visits were found to be more effective than in-clinic individual visits, although the differences were small.

Christie Befort, PhD, a professor at the University of Kansas Medical Center, explained that group therapy provides additional support and accountability among peers.

Byron Gajewski, PhD, another co-author of the study, noted that patients with higher self-esteem scores showed a 15-pound weight loss improvement in group settings.

However, the effectiveness of group therapy diminished as self-esteem scores dropped below 60.

Lindsay Fourman, MD, from Massachusetts General Hospital, advised interpreting the findings with caution, as they do not establish causality.

Gajewski suggested that clinicians could use self-esteem scores to predict weight loss outcomes and set more accurate expectations for patients.

He also noted that while some patients may initially hesitate, they can quickly adjust to group settings.

The study highlights the importance of considering individual psychological factors when choosing between group and individual therapy for weight loss.

What this adds

The study adds to the ongoing debate about whether individual or group therapy is more effective for weight loss.

It also underscores the need for clinicians to be mindful of patients' psychological readiness for group therapy.

Background

Eli Lilly's new GLP-1 drug retatrutide helped people with Type 2 diabetes lose up to 60 pounds, or about 23% of their body weight, according to late-stage trial results published Tuesday in The Lancet.

What's still developing

Sources