Home · Politics · Oct 5 archive
Supreme Court Reinstates Expanded SAVE Voter Verification System
Confirmed
In Short: The Supreme Court on Friday granted the administration's emergency request to block a lower-court ruling that had halted the modified SAVE system.
The Supreme Court on Friday granted the administration's emergency request to block a lower-court ruling that had halted the modified SAVE system.
The justices found the administration likely to succeed on its appeal, restoring access to SAVE while a separate federal election law still governs how states can use the information.
The system can search federal citizenship records individually or in bulk, giving election officials a tool to identify registrations that may require further review.
President Donald Trump directed the Department of Homeland Security to expand SAVE as part of a March 2025 executive order focused on citizenship verification in elections.
Several Republican-led states have since compared their voter rolls against SAVE, and some voters flagged as potential noncitizens have had their registrations canceled.
The administration has defended SAVE as a verification tool that helps states identify records requiring closer examination.
However, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that the harm caused by burdening or disenfranchising even a few lawful voters outweighs the nonexistent harm that the government experiences when it is prevented from taking an action it likely lacks the authority to take.
Jackson noted that the court's conservative majority wrote that the government was likely to prevail on the merits of the case, overturning a district court order blocking the Trump administration's use of the program.
The federal district court blocked the Trump administration from using the expanded database in June following a lawsuit by the League of Women Voters and the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
A federal district court judge, Sparkle Sooknanan, a Biden appointee, wrote that the federal government had knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote.
In Denton County, SAVE identified 84 supposed noncitizens registered to vote, but the county elections administrator, Frank Phillips, expressed doubt about the accuracy of the database.
Phillips told ProPublica, “What is bugging me is I think our voter rolls may be more accurate than this database.”
What this adds
The Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database has a history of producing false positives of noncitizens voting, leading to sensational headlines of alleged voter fraud that turn out to be untrue on closer inspection.
The expanded SAVE system was optimized by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency shortly after Trump’s January 2025 inauguration.
The Supreme Court’s decision leaves the broader fight over how federal citizenship records can be used in voter verification for another stage of the case.
Background
The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to resume its policy of deporting illegal immigrants to third countries, a move that has been challenged in lower courts.
The Supreme Court, with no dissents, upheld a state court order requiring Missouri to use the 2022 election map, which favors Republicans in six of the eight districts but preserves a key seat for Democrats.
What's confirmed
- The Supreme Court on Friday granted the administration's emergency request to block a lower-court ruling that had halted the modified SAVE system.
- The justices found the administration likely to succeed on its appeal, restoring access to SAVE while a separate federal election law still governs how states can use the information.
- The system can search federal citizenship records individually or in bulk, giving election officials a tool to identify registrations that may require further review.
- President Donald Trump directed the Department of Homeland Security to expand SAVE as part of a March 2025 executive order focused on citizenship verification in elections.
- Several Republican-led states have since compared their voter rolls against SAVE, and some voters flagged as potential noncitizens have had their registrations canceled.
- The administration has defended SAVE as a verification tool that helps states identify records requiring closer examination.
- However, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that the harm caused by burdening or disenfranchising even a few lawful voters outweighs the nonexistent harm that the government experiences when it is prevented from taking an action it likely lacks the authority to take.
- Jackson noted that the court's conservative majority wrote that the government was likely to prevail on the merits of the case, overturning a district court order blocking the Trump administration's use of the program.
- The federal district court blocked the Trump administration from using the expanded database in June following a lawsuit by the League of Women Voters and the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
- A federal district court judge, Sparkle Sooknanan, a Biden appointee, wrote that the federal government had knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote.
- In Denton County, SAVE identified 84 supposed noncitizens registered to vote, but the county elections administrator, Frank Phillips, expressed doubt about the accuracy of the database.
What's still developing
- Jackson argued that the Court was allowing the system to resume while substantial questions under federal privacy laws remain unresolved and pointed to the potential burden on eligible voters whose records are inaccurate or incomplete.
- “The District Court’s order thus inhibits the Federal Government’s efforts to assist state and local agencies in the proper administration of the midterm elections,” the GOP-appointed justices wrote in an unsigned opinion.
- As Judd Legum and Rebecca Crosby wrote for Popular Information : Shortly after Trump’s January 2025 inauguration, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency “ optimized “ the SAVE database over two weeks, quickly adding a lot of additional information, including full social security numbers.
- The Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database run by the Department of Homeland Security has a long and documented history of producing false positives of noncitizens voting, leading to sensational headlines of alleged voter fraud that turn out to be untrue on closer inspection.
- Used in this manner, SAVE has produced an extraordinarily high error rate.
- The Supreme Court’s decision requires the state to use the map it enacted in 2022 for the general election, leaving in place the Sept. 3 Missouri Supreme Court ruling requiring the state to place a veto referendum to uphold or repeal the 2025 map on the November ballot.