Home · Science · Sep 25 archive

New Study Improves Precision of Volcanic Dating Methods

Confirmed

Science Desk

In Short: Researchers at the Berkeley Geochronology Center, UC Berkeley, and the University of Padua have published a study in Science Advances detailing a new method for dating volcanic eruptions with unprecedented precision.

Why Evolutionary Dating Methods Are a Complete LIE
YouTube — Answers in Genesis Canada

The study leverages historical records from Pliny the Younger, who documented the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 CE, to calibrate the argon-argon dating method.

Paul Renne, a Berkeley professor and director of the Berkeley Geochronology Center, explained, “If you want to put together the eruptive history of a volcano in relatively recent time, precision and accuracy really count.”

YouTube — Answers in Genesis Canada YouTube

The team tested their recalibrated method on eight samples of sanidine, a potassium-rich volcanic mineral, achieving an accuracy of 0.4% and a precision of 0.7%. This level of precision is highly unusual for more recent volcanic events.

The argon-argon method measures the decay of potassium-40 into argon-40, a process that typically occurs after a volcanic eruption.

By using Pliny the Younger’s account, the researchers were able to infer the exact date of the Vesuvius eruption, which they used to calibrate their dating method.

This new benchmark will help scientists more accurately date ancient volcanic eruptions, providing new insights into the human past and volcanic activity.

The improved precision will also aid in mitigating modern safety threats to cities like Naples, Italy, and Mexico City, Mexico, which still face volcanic risks.

Additionally, the method will enhance other dating techniques such as carbon-14 and uranium-lead, offering more accurate dates for Earth’s ancient creatures and rocks.

Renne added, “We’re hoping to really unify as many geologic dating methods as we can by using the same mathematics, the same Bayesian approach, and just bringing more data, more raw observations into that mix.”

What's confirmed

What's still developing

Sources