Home · Business · Sep 18 archive

Uber Ordered to Pay $40M After Driver Abandons Intoxicated Passenger

Confirmed

Business Desk

In Short: Uber has been ordered to pay $40 million to the family of a woman who was fatally struck on a California highway after being abandoned by the company's driver.

Uber has been ordered to pay $40 million to the family of Emily Normandin-Parker, a 23-year-old woman who was fatally struck on a California highway after being abandoned by the company's driver, Vu Tran, according to a ruling by Judge Richard Stone.

Normandin-Parker had booked an Uber with a friend on August 12, 2023, but her friend became sick and vomited during the ride.

The driver, Tran, allegedly pulled over to the side of the highway and ordered Normandin-Parker out of the car, leaving her on the freeway where she was hit and killed by another vehicle.

Her parents said Normandin-Parker did everything Uber tells riders to do, making the responsible choice not to drive and trusting Uber to get her home safely.

Uber had argued that Tran was an independent contractor and that the company was not responsible for his actions.

However, Judge Stone ruled that Uber could be held liable for the actions of its drivers, rejecting the company's arguments that Proposition 22, which classifies drivers as independent contractors, shields it from liability.

The judge noted that Uber could be subject to both public utility rules and a non-transferable legal duty for safety as a common carrier.

Lawyers for Normandin-Parker’s parents said evidence presented during the arbitration showed Uber had received previous complaints about Tran’s driving.

Uber spokesperson Gabriela Condarco-Quesada told CalMatters that the company disagrees with the decision.

The arbitrator's decision highlights the ongoing debate over the responsibilities of ride-hailing companies for the actions of their drivers.

What this adds

The ruling underscores the potential liability ride-hailing companies face for the actions of their drivers, despite efforts to classify them as independent contractors.

The case adds to the scrutiny of Uber's safety protocols and the broader debate over gig economy worker classification.

What's confirmed

What's still developing

Sources