Home · Politics · Sep 18 archive
Trump Orders DOJ Not to Appeal Suppressors Ruling
Confirmed
In Short: President Trump directed the DOJ not to appeal a court decision against suppressor registration requirements.

President Donald Trump ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) not to appeal a ruling against suppressor registration. The ruling, secured in August via the Silencer Shop v. ATF lawsuit, declared registration requirements for suppressors and short barrel rifles and shotguns unconstitutional.
Judge James Wesley Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued the verdict on August 5, 2026. The case was filed in October 2025, following the passage of President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill, which removed the $200 federal tax on suppressors and short barrel rifles and shotguns while retaining National Firearms Act registration requirements.
Since the ruling, Federal Firearms License holders (FFLs) have been awaiting guidance from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) on how to implement the decision. The ruling applies to both current and future members of these groups.
The decision to not appeal the ruling has been closely watched by FFLs, members of Congress, and other stakeholders. The case highlights the ongoing tension between federal regulations and constitutional challenges to firearm-related laws.
What's confirmed
- President Donald Trump ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) not to appeal a ruling against suppressor registration. The ruling, secured in August via the Silencer Shop v. ATF lawsuit, declared registration requirements for suppressors and short barrel rifles and shotguns unconstitutional.
- Judge James Wesley Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued the verdict on August 5, 2026. The case was filed in October 2025, following the passage of President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill, which removed the $200 federal tax on suppressors and short barrel rifles and shotguns while retaining National Firearms Act registration requirements.
- Since the ruling, Federal Firearms License holders (FFLs) have been awaiting guidance from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) on how to implement the decision. The ruling applies to both current and future members of these groups.
- The decision to not appeal the ruling has been closely watched by FFLs, members of Congress, and other stakeholders. The case highlights the ongoing tension between federal regulations and constitutional challenges to firearm-related laws.
What's still developing
- Election experts are warning the Supreme Court that affirming a lower court's ruling could mean that noncitizens, minors or factitious people listed on state voter rolls could be impossible to remove.
- The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in RNC v. Mi Familia Vote in December and will determine whether a pair of Arizona's state laws that remove the registrations of noncitizen voters from voter rolls within 90 days of an election and require voters to show proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote are in violation of the National Voter Registration Act.
- Fox News' Matt Finn reports on the federal indictment details, revealing the suspect received a voter registration card using a gym membership.
- The Australian government has ordered an end to new international student enrolments in the Graduate Diploma of Management (Learning) (GDML) course, citing concerns over the misuse of the student visa system.
- In compliance with the new order, providers will have their Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS) registration for the GDML course suspended or cancelled automatically.
- The Reserve Bank of India rejected Tata Sons' application to surrender its registration.
- This ruling ensures Tata Sons remains under stricter regulatory oversight for at least five years.
- Will China’s dollar bond sale in Saudi Arabia trump the US in financial world?
