Home · Politics · Sep 17 archive
Redistricting Could Decide House Majority
Confirmed
In Short: Redistricting efforts by Republicans aim to secure their majority in the House, but face legal and political challenges.
Redistricting efforts by Republicans are intensifying as they seek to secure their majority in the House of Representatives, according to new reports from Cook Political and The Guardian.
Republicans currently hold a narrow majority in the House, and historical trends suggest that the party in the White House often loses seats in midterm elections.
In South Carolina, Republican leaders are pushing for redistricting changes despite concerns raised by Democratic lawmakers.
Tennessee's Republican legislature recently moved to eliminate the state's one Democratic, Black-majority congressional district, a move that aligns with former President Donald Trump's urging.
Legislative rules in Tennessee require a two-thirds majority to add a redistricting vote to the session following its adjournment, complicating the process.
Shane Massey, the Republican majority leader in South Carolina’s senate, argued that redistricting could be against the state's interest, highlighting the political and legal challenges facing these efforts.
What's confirmed
- Redistricting efforts by Republicans are intensifying as they seek to secure their majority in the House of Representatives, according to new reports from Cook Political and The Guardian.
- Republicans currently hold a narrow majority in the House, and historical trends suggest that the party in the White House often loses seats in midterm elections.
- In South Carolina, Republican leaders are pushing for redistricting changes despite concerns raised by Democratic lawmakers.
- Tennessee's Republican legislature recently moved to eliminate the state's one Democratic, Black-majority congressional district, a move that aligns with former President Donald Trump's urging.
- Legislative rules in Tennessee require a two-thirds majority to add a redistricting vote to the session following its adjournment, complicating the process.
- Shane Massey, the Republican majority leader in South Carolina’s senate, argued that redistricting could be against the state's interest, highlighting the political and legal challenges facing these efforts.
What's still developing
- Few left in Washington remember a time when one party or the other had a firm grip on a majority.
- But, while all of those are important factors, the most important—and potentially most substantial—is redistricting.
- Republicans had a razor-thin majority on the Hill, with a six-seat majority in the House and a 50-50 Senate (until May of 2001 when GOP Sen. Jim Jeffords became an independent and threw the balance of power to the Democrats).
- As Republicans scramble to redraw key districts after the US supreme court rendered ineffective a major section of the civil rights law that prevented racial discrimination, Shane Massey, the Republican majority leader in South Carolina’s senate, argued in an extraordinary address that doing so would be against the interest of his state.
- Trump had urged them to back the redistricting proposal on Monday evening.
- Trump called Massey over the weekend, the senate majority leader told his peers on Tuesday.