Holdout Juror Reveals 'Activists' Wanted 'Not Guilty' in Lindsay Clancy Case

12:03 PM ETDeveloping

Politics Desk

In Short: Desronvil, the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy case, has spoken out, saying that from day one, eight jurors were convinced of her not guilty, while two were for guilty, and two were undecided.

Desronvil, the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy case, has revealed that from day one, eight jurors were convinced of her not guilty, while two were for guilty, and two were undecided. According to Desronvil, the eight jurors who believed in Clancy's not guilty were described as 'activists' who tried to convince the other four jurors of their stance. Desronvil's testimony comes as the trial's next hearing is set for Sept. 29.

Marcel, a juror in the Plymouth state court, recounted Desronvil's account, stating, 'He said that from day one, he said eight of them were going for Lindsay Clancy not guilty. That was on day one. Eight were going not guilty. Two were for guilty. And two didn’t make up their mind.' Desronvil described the jury's deliberations as a struggle, with the eight not guilty jurors trying to convince the other four.

Clancy, who admitted to killing her three children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan, in January 2023, has sparked controversy and conspiracy theories. Social media has been rife with false claims suggesting that Patrick Clancy, her husband, actually killed the children and framed Lindsay. These theories have fueled public outrage and debate.

Patrick Clancy, now separated from Lindsay, is set to appear on '60 Minutes' this Sunday, marking the first time he has spoken publicly since the mistrial. The case has been marked by intense media scrutiny and public interest, with some jurors describing the experience as a struggle against what they perceived as activist influence.

What's still developing

After 36 hours of deliberations that spanned a week, jurors in Plymouth state court said on three separate occasions they were deadlocked and did not reach a unanimous verdict, as Breitbart News reported.
RELATED: President Trump Responds to Request to Pardon Lindsay Clancy — “3 Children Are Dead” In the interview Desronvil outlined his fellow jurors behaved like “activists” who wanted the accused found not guilty from day one of deliberations.
He testified about his wife’s mental decline — which he said started back in September 2022 — and to what happened in the moments before and after Lindsay strangled their children in their basement.
Jurors in the trial who heard the call, and who thought Lindsay should have been found not criminally responsible by reason of insanity, have publicly said they will never forget the audio they heard.
How is it that there are some people out there that are outraged over Sydney Sweeney's Novig ad but then support Lindsay Clancy?
Massachusetts Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial as the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the case.
Clancy had been charged with first-degree murder in the January 2023 deaths of her children, each of whom had been strangled with exercise bands.
If you transcribed a session, the pauses would look like nothing: beats of silence, extra breaths, slowing down.

Sources

Breitbartlink