Home · Health · Sep 16 archive

Orissa High Court Directs Reassessment of NEET Candidate’s Thalassemia Disability Claim

Confirmed

Health Desk

In Short: The Orissa High Court has ordered a fresh assessment of a NEET candidate’s thalassemia disability claim, reversing a previous decision by a medical assessment board.

Orissa High Court has directed a fresh assessment of a NEET candidate’s thalassemia disability claim, reversing a previous decision by a medical assessment board. The court's order, issued on September 10, challenges the board's conclusion that the candidate’s Beta Thalassemia Trait did not qualify as a disability, directing authorities to reassess her percentage of disability. The court's decision highlights the importance of adhering to the legal definition of disability as outlined in the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

The court’s order is based on the observation that the medical assessment board’s opinion was overly focused on locomotor disability, despite thalassemia not impacting functional ability. The bench emphasized that once a disease is included within the category of ‘specified disability,’ the assessment should be restricted to that specific condition. The court also referred to a 2019 notification by the board of governors that includes thalassemia among specified disabilities.

The NEET candidate, who had initially sought to avail the disability quota, had submitted a certificate indicating a disability percentage above 40%. However, the medical assessment board concluded that her Beta Thalassemia Trait, an asymptomatic carrier state, did not cause significant functional disability. The court’s decision underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to disability assessment, ensuring that the spirit of the Act is upheld.

The Orissa High Court’s order is part of a broader legal debate on the interpretation of disability under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The court’s directive to conduct a fresh assessment is expected to have implications for other similar cases, potentially opening the door for more accurate and inclusive disability certification.

What's confirmed

What's still developing

Sources