Home · World · Sep 1 archive
Lindsay Clancy jury ordered to keep deliberating after failing to reach unanimous verdict
Confirmed
The jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial said it was still deadlocked Tuesday morning, Sept. 1, after three days of deliberation. Clancy, 36, a former labor and delivery nurse, is charged in the 2023 deaths of her three young children at the family's home in Duxbury Clancy, 36, a former labor and delivery nurse, is charged in the 2023 deaths of her three young children at the family's home in Duxbury The judge in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial has ordered jurors to keep deliberating after they said they could not reach a unanimous decision.
On Tuesday morning, after three days of deliberation, a jury of nine women and three men will continue to deliberate, with several options before them: This hinges on the postpartum psychosis defence - her legal team argued that Clancy hallucinated a voice that told her to kill the children.
A guilty verdict for first-degree murder would mean the jury found Clancy killed her children with “deliberate premeditation” or “extreme atrocity or cruelty”; a guilty verdict for second-degree murder wouldn’t carry either of those conditions.
"For this verdict, the jurors may not be convinced that the actions leading up to the murder rose to the level of pre-planned [or] premeditated but that instead, Clancy consciously saw an opportunity to commit the killings at the specified time," Cucolo said.
The jury received yet another option when the judge allowed them to find Clancy guilty of manslaughter - previously a point of contention between the defence and the prosecution. "This option allows the jury to accept that the murders were not planned or calculated but that instead Clancy made a split-second decision to act," Cucolo said.
“I challenge Nancy Grace to show us where Lindsay Clancy ever said, ever googled ‘How to kill’ — words that came out of her mouth,” Reddington said. “I know that this was a long trial, all right,” Judge William Sullivan said in response to the jury’s note on Tuesday.
The manslaughter option says that through an involuntary intoxication, in this case an overprescription of her medication, Clancy experienced a mental defect that was a mitigator in her understanding what she was doing, Hershon said.
Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said during closing arguments there was no dispute Clancy was suffering from mental illness but it was not so severe that she didn't know right from wrong. This is the most serious potential outcome for Clancy - being found guilty of first-degree murder, which is the intentional and premeditated killing of another person.
What's confirmed
- The jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial said it was still deadlocked Tuesday morning, Sept. 1, after three days of deliberation.
- On Tuesday morning, after three days of deliberation, a jury of nine women and three men will continue to deliberate, with several options before them: This hinges on the postpartum psychosis defence - her legal team…
- The jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial said it was still deadlocked Tuesday morning, Sept.
- On Tuesday morning, after three days of deliberation, a jury of nine women and three men will continue to deliberate, with several options before them: This hinges on the postpartum psychosis defence - her legal team arg
- A guilty verdict for first-degree murder would mean the jury found Clancy killed her children with “deliberate premeditation” or “extreme atrocity or cruelty”; a guilty verdict for second-degree murder wouldn’t carry eit
- "For this verdict, the jurors may not be convinced that the actions leading up to the murder rose to the level of pre-planned [or] premeditated but that instead, Clancy consciously saw an opportunity to commit the killin
What's still developing
- Clancy, 36, a former labor and delivery nurse, is charged in the 2023 deaths of her three young children at the family's home in Duxbury Clancy, 36, a former labor and delivery nurse, is charged in the 2023 deaths of…
- On Friday, the jurors had asked to look at a knife that Clancy used to cut herself and bags with empty prescription pill bottles found in her house.
- “I know that this was a long trial, all right,” Judge William Sullivan said in response to the jury’s note on Tuesday.
- Prosecutors said Clancy strangled the children because she was depressed and tired of living, and made a conscious choice to kill them before attempting suicide.
- A guilty verdict for first-degree murder would mean the jury found Clancy killed her children with “deliberate premeditation” or “extreme atrocity or cruelty”; a guilty verdict for second-degree murder wouldn’t carry…
- “I challenge Nancy Grace to show us where Lindsay Clancy ever said, ever googled ‘How to kill’ — words that came out of her mouth,” Reddington said.
- This is the most serious potential outcome for Clancy - being found guilty of first-degree murder, which is the intentional and premeditated killing of another person.
- Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said during closing arguments there was no dispute Clancy was suffering from mental illness but it was not so severe that she didn't know right from wrong.